Anyone seeking a non-invasive therapy to relieve pain, promote healing, and improve function may have come across two popular modalities: ultrasound therapy (UST) and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS).
If you have ever had an injury or suffered from chronic pain, you can consider ultrasound therapy and electrical muscle stimulation as potential treatment options.
Ultrasound therapy is a technique that entails the use of ultrasound waves above the range of human hearing capacity for the sake of treating different injuries. The therapy work by increasing the blood flow in a localized area thereby reducing the swelling and inflammation in that area.
Electrical is a technique used to create a muscle contraction using electrical impulses creating an effect similar to voluntary contraction and release of muscle many times consecutively. This process reinforces and repairs tissue, especially for the muscles that have become feeble due to injury or disease.
Nevertheless, choosing between these two modalities can be quite perplexing until one is clear about the differences in application and advantages of each.
I will compare Ultrasound Therapy and Electrical Muscle Stimulation, considering factors such as their purpose, technique, duration, frequency, cost, convenience, and more.
Thereby, helping you to develop a better understanding of these techniques that can enable you to take informed decisions on which one may be suitable for your needs.
Difference Between Ultrasound and Electrical Stimulation Therapy
1. Purpose in relieving pain
The benefits of ultrasound therapy include the reduction of pain, swelling, and muscular spasms, as well as the promotion of tissue repair and an increase in range of motion.
It induces a thermal effect that improves blood flow and lessens pain by using high-frequency sound waves to penetrate deeply into the tissue.
The use of electrical muscle stimulation, on the other hand, helps to strengthen and extend muscles while also stimulating neurons and muscles.
Electrical impulses are used to target certain nerves or muscles, causing contractions or obstructing pain signals.
2. Technique of application
Ultrasound therapy involves applying a gel to the skin and moving a small handheld device over the affected area creating a warm sensation, which is caused by the high-frequency sound waves emitted from the device that penetrates the skin and tissue.
The treatment usually lasts between 5 to 10 minutes. Electrical muscle stimulation can be applied using various devices such as pads placed on the skin or needles inserted into the muscles. The insertion of needles generates the effect of acupuncture.
This is followed by placing electrodes on the skin near the target area and delivering electrical impulses through the electrodes.
The intensity and frequency of the impulses administered depend on the patient’s tolerance capacity and therefore can be adjusted accordingly.
3. Duration and Frequency for achieving optimum benefit
The duration and frequency of ultrasound therapy and electrical muscle stimulation can vary depending on the patient’s condition and goals.
The therapy is usually administered 2-3 times per week for a duration of 4-6 weeks. Each session lasts about 5-10 minutes.
Whereas, electrical stimulation can be administered daily for 15-30 minutes, depending on the patient’s condition and goals.
4. Average Cost in the application of these modalities
The cost of ultrasound therapy and electrical muscle stimulation can vary depending on several factors, including the provider, location, and insurance coverage.
It is generally observed that ultrasound therapy is relatively more expensive than electrical muscle stimulation, with an average estimated cost of ultrasound therapy being $50-$200 per session and $30-$100 per session for electrical muscle stimulation.
5. Convenience in the administration of the two modalities
Both ultrasound massage therapy and electrical muscle stimulation can be accomplished in a clinical setting, such as a physical therapy clinic, chiropractic office, or hospital.
However, electrical muscle stimulation can also be administered at home using a portable unit, unlike ultrasound therapy which requires the use of a handheld device and gel, which may be more difficult to use at home.
6. Limitations in application
Ultrasound therapy cannot be applied to persons with metal implants, open wounds, sarcomas, carcinomas, or bony prominence. Moreover, it requires a licensed and well-trained professional to administer the therapy in a precise manner.
Likewise, electrical muscle stimulation cannot be applied to pregnant women, and the placement of electrodes on open wounds, or bony prominence.
7. Combination therapy (UST + EMS)
Combination therapy refers to the application of various therapies with the aim of achieving a higher degree of result in treating a particular condition.
In many cases, the combination of ultrasound therapy and electrical muscle stimulation are used simultaneously and has shown better effectiveness among patients.
In supplementary, there have been many pieces of research that recognized the effectiveness of the combination of these two modalities than using either technique alone in certain conditions.
An extra advantage of combination therapy is the reduction in overall cost and decrease in the duration of treatment.
ULTRASOUND VS ELECTRICAL STIMULATION [COMPARISON SUMMARY]
|Type of modality
|Technique for application
|Soft tissue injuries, reduce pain and inflammation
|Handheld device delivering high-frequency sound waves
|5-10 minutes, several sessions per week
|More expensive requires specialized equipment and licensed professionals
|Less convenient for home use
|Electrical Muscle Stimulation
|Reduce pain and muscle spasms, improve range of motion, promote muscle recovery
|Pads or needles delivering electrical impulses
|15-60 minutes, daily or multiple times per day
|Less expensive, portable devices are available
|More convenient for home use
Electrical Stimulation Vs Ultrasound – Which Is Better For You?
The article tries to convey that both ultrasonic therapy and electrical muscle stimulation can be effective in relieving pain and promoting healing. Yet, the choice between these modalities is based on the patient’s condition, goals, and preferences.
If you have a musculoskeletal injury or inflammation, ultrasound therapy may be more appropriate, as it works by penetrating deep into the tissue and foster healing.
However, if you have nerve or muscle-related pain or weakness, electrical muscle stimulation may be more suitable, as it can target specific nerves or muscles and induce contractions or block pain signals.
In conclusion, for anyone suffering from a soft tissue injury or chronic pain, I recommend ultrasound therapy to enhance healing thereby reduction of inflammation. On the other hand, for anyone experiencing muscle spasms or trying to advance their mobility, my recommendation is electrical stimulation.
Though ultrasound therapy is an effective option, it cannot be applied to patients with metal implants, open wounds, sarcoma, or carcinoma but electrical muscle stimulation has an advantage over this as it can be administered to patients with these conditions.
Additionally, for anyone looking for a more convenient option for home use, electrical stimulation may be a better choice, as it can be performed using a portable device.
Many times, ultrasound therapy and electrical muscle stimulation are used together as combination therapy since one compliment the other in relieving pain quickly and promoting better health conditions.
However, it is always important to consult with a healthcare professional or licensed therapist to determine which option is best for your specific needs and condition.